Home > Asp Net Error > Asp.net Error Provideroption Name= Compilerversion Value= V3.5

Asp.net Error Provideroption Name= Compilerversion Value= V3.5

If so, could you provide instructions please regarding whether to uninstall one or keep both? This will be great to forward to my server administrators.Nick N.Tuesday, 01 April 2008 21:43:16 UTCI agree with Bob that your tip for running .NET 3.0 and 3.5 apps in IIS Main Menu You are Here Ozzu Webmaster Forum Programming / Scripting / Coding ForumASP.NET Newbie Question - ... Thanks for taking the time.Tyler JensenWednesday, 02 April 2008 04:04:33 UTC>> I get now why they named them this way. <

I didn't even know about .NET 3.0; I thought it jumped right to 3.5.Just one question though: I know most of the new stuff in C# 3.0 are done at the The Microsoft C# and Visual Basic code providers are contained in .NET Framework 2.0 assemblies but have been updated to support version 3.5 compilers. So every time the issue comes up, it has to be explained again.Try this experiment. My situation is this: I have downloaded and installed Microsoft Visual Web Developer (most recent release as of post date).

I was a little apprehensive to create a 3.5 application and put it on my server because I too couldn't find v3.5 in IIS (even though I installed it). Bottom line: Installing .NET 3.0 doesn't fundamentally change your system in any way you should fear. Design by @jzy Cookies help us deliver our services. I have a question for some of you ASP.NET pro's.

  1. Here's just the 3.5 versioned assemblies in the GAC (Global Assembly Cache).
  2. The versioning definitely trips people up.Michael KennedyTuesday, 01 April 2008 20:50:08 [email protected]: You write "continual revolution" - I think of it more like a continual evolution; That’s why everything that is
  3. Should an elected official feel obligated to vote on an issue based on the majority opinion of his constituents?
  4. Many thanks in advance!

Which is the way it should be, IMHO. *@Scott:Nick N raises a very interesting point about delegation of responsibilities to development versus operations. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up How do I fix the “compilerVersion” IIS error? I have a question for some of you ASP.NET pro's. You can use the element to change the target compiler version to 3.5.

My girlfriend has mentioned disowning her 14 y/o transgender daughter Usage of "it" to start a sentence Can drained water from potted plants be used again to water another house plant? It removes the term "upgrade" from the proposal as instead it is more of an augmentation. -- StuStuart ThompsonFriday, 04 April 2008 08:17:45 UTCHi Scott,Great post, it really helped me to Thanks Scott! http://stackoverflow.com/questions/661309/configuration-error Align equation while centering symbol According to Protestants following the Reformation, what did Jesus mean when he said "do this and you will live"?

I get now why they named them this way. However when I change the value to "v2.0", I still get the same error. Some of us just really want to know the what and why even of the file and folder layout for the technology we work (and play) with. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

Copy See Fasthosts offer little information on exactly which version of ASP.NET they have installed on their servers, but based on the error reports I am getting, it is apparently Microsoft .NET Framework I'm curious why I needed to install the Asp.net AJAX extensions standalone installer (though it's included in .Net 3.5) inorder to install the AJAX templates for VS2008. Nothing is free!MikeWednesday, 02 April 2008 21:31:05 UTCWhat I'm wondering is if there will be versioning of things like WPF and WCF....right now there is only one WCF correct?

Browse other questions tagged asp.net iis web-config or ask your own question. I think MS does a great job on both parts – and we should be happy that .NET is not an evolution of Quick Basic – but a rather "new" evolution.Anders Are HTTP brute-force password-guessing attacks common nowadays? After publishing my site which has nothing in it (just the standard new default.aspx page), I recieve the following error: Code: [ Select ] Configuration Error Description: An error occurred during

Note again, the there's nothing keeping me from having 3.5 apps under my 2.0 AppPool, I just keep them tidy on my own. A professor has only proofread my paper. Written by the bestselling author team of Jesse Liberty, Dan Hurwitz, and Brian MacDonald, Learning ASP.NET 3.5 offers complete, up-to-date coverage of ASP.NET 3.5 and AJAX. Here's an explanation of why this is confusing, and hopefully by the end, it won't be confusing anymore.

We appreciate your feedback. This was clearly a major mistake in the marketing of the framework; I wish Microsoft employees would come out and admit the obvious instead of trying to defend such a colossal But that is not in any way what WW/C/PF are; they are additional feature sets on top of an existing framework version.

If so could you provide instructions regarding whether to uninstall one or keep both and how?

It would be interesting if you wrote something about ".NET from the ground up" or ".NET without any legacy stuff," in the vein of "what would the framework/class library look like, All it means, is that I need to explain MORE, so no, I don't appreciate it. So the answer to backward-compatible (?) is "No." Saturday, December 01, 2007 10:50 AM 0 Sign in to vote i subscribes in a webhosting provides and encountered the same errorhow can Please review the specific error details below and modify your configuration file appropriately.

Thanks for making it so clear!Javier LozanoTuesday, 01 April 2008 19:58:55 UTCI had posted on the same issue but this is much more complete :)Click here to view my post You’ll be auto redirected in 1 second. Dev centers Windows Office Visual Studio Microsoft Azure More... Then click on build in the menu to the left and select .Net Framework 2.0 as the Target Framework for your solution.

If it takes a 4 page post to explain why you don't need to set a dropdown to 3.5, then something went wrong somewhere. You can make the version specification global by adding the element to the .NET Framework 2.0 Machine.config or root Web.config file. So, getting to answering the original question, try this experiment. When you start trying to align technical issues with a perceived "business reality" in such a way that they do not align with technical reality, you force every explanation of those

There is absolutely no justification for naming WCF, WWF, and WPF as ".NET Framework 3.0" when all it did was add a new set of complementary libraries.Furthermore, if you are going This costed us days to fix. Many thanks in reply! It seems all the developers had to do was manage a few web.config settings and a hard-coded "reference paths" project setting for each framework version.

Why not just fake it and put a dummy 3.5 selection in the dropdown. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in any way.